Comments on: 2021 Best Radiation Blocking Cell Phone Cases https://superfoodly.com/best-radiation-blocking-cell-phone-cases/ Thu, 18 Feb 2021 20:06:01 +0000 hourly 1 By: JL https://superfoodly.com/best-radiation-blocking-cell-phone-cases/#comment-75738 Wed, 20 Jan 2021 20:16:03 +0000 https://superfoodly.com/?p=5645#comment-75738 I need an effective sleeve to cover my entire laptop and notebook, plus my i5 phone. I want 100% emf protection. My son lasted 5 years with brain cancer in his cerebellum before he died. The cancer was on the side and back of his head. he was diagnosed right after finishing college.
Can someone please help me with this. I am serious. I need the most effective radiation protection coverage on all sides.

]]> By: Lisa https://superfoodly.com/best-radiation-blocking-cell-phone-cases/#comment-63720 Fri, 27 Mar 2020 22:17:37 +0000 https://superfoodly.com/?p=5645#comment-63720 Hi, I might be missing something but I read here you say that 67% of the radiation comes out the back side of the phone. Then when I went to the Amazon page for the Safe Sleeve it says : “Integrated into the front flap, SafeSleeve’s EMF Radiation Protection cell phone case…..” Back side danger and front flap integration – does not compute…..

]]> By: Martin Dressler https://superfoodly.com/best-radiation-blocking-cell-phone-cases/#comment-50530 Wed, 10 Apr 2019 09:03:24 +0000 https://superfoodly.com/?p=5645#comment-50530 I bought a safe sleeve for my iPhone6 some years ago and was now looking into buying a new case as I am going to purchase a new phone soon. So I went to get the latest shielding updates and then came across this test conducted by Safe Sleeves competitors RF Safe: https://www.rfsafe.com/ftc-action-looms-over-safesleeve-case-misleads-consumers-years-exposed-california-news-channel-review/.
This shows how the SafeSleeve doesn’t shield the waves (can’t tell if this was conducted the right way).
There are also screenshots from SuperFoodly comments that I wasn’t able to locate on this site anymore.

Based on my understanding, the rationale for a case to be selected as one of the best cases and to make it on this list is based on data that was provided by vendors.

So, if SafeSleeve (as stated in the above article) has only FCC tested the shielding material and not the entire case, and the RFSafe the entire case, are we comparing the right data here?

As a consumer, I definitely want to rely on tests made on the actual case and not only on the base material.

In conclusion, I can say that I am confused.
1. Are above data based on actual phone cases tests conducted by an FCC approved lab? If yes, great. If not, I would expect an update on the above list.
2. Can I trust a test conducted by a competitor or is this is misleading as well? What do you think?

It would see great value if you as a trusted source can help us to shed some light on this so that we can be sure to purchase a product that is truly doing what its promises.

]]> By: Joy https://superfoodly.com/best-radiation-blocking-cell-phone-cases/#comment-45804 Wed, 02 Jan 2019 22:44:01 +0000 https://superfoodly.com/?p=5645#comment-45804 In reply to Aharon Ungar.

Defender Shield is garbage. The readings stay the same for my phone whether it has their case on it or not! On top if that, their customer service is rude and defensive.

]]> By: Joy https://superfoodly.com/best-radiation-blocking-cell-phone-cases/#comment-45803 Wed, 02 Jan 2019 22:42:28 +0000 https://superfoodly.com/?p=5645#comment-45803 In reply to Gemma S.

Same exact thing with DefenderShield. They got defensive when I called to question the readings I was getting on my meter, and then belittled my meter saying it was unreliable. Well, it was the same meter they were using in their website demos soooo….. I’m now thinking that all of these companies are a scam. If I didn’t have a meter I’d have never known and just kept using in blind faith!

]]> By: Susanne Herb-Eddy https://superfoodly.com/best-radiation-blocking-cell-phone-cases/#comment-44284 Sat, 15 Dec 2018 15:48:22 +0000 https://superfoodly.com/?p=5645#comment-44284 Hello, did you check the RFSafe website and their products? how do they compare to the safe sleeve? I would be thankful for your insights/

]]> By: Ann Maes https://superfoodly.com/best-radiation-blocking-cell-phone-cases/#comment-41824 Sat, 20 Oct 2018 15:12:39 +0000 https://superfoodly.com/?p=5645#comment-41824 I don’t see the value in the tablet cover if the shield only protects when the cover is closed. I’m only near the tablet when I’m using it.

]]> By: Daniel https://superfoodly.com/best-radiation-blocking-cell-phone-cases/#comment-40395 Fri, 14 Sep 2018 13:00:46 +0000 https://superfoodly.com/?p=5645#comment-40395 You mentioned not using one product because it’s challenging to remember which direction to face the phone inside your pocket. But I just found on the SafeSleeve website that they advise the customer to do the same thing:

Under Product > How to Use:
“When storing in your pocket, face the front flap towards your body to deflect the radiation away.”

The front flap is the only part that has radiation protection. So if you put it facing the wrong direction in your pocket, you get all the radiation.

We’ve used Defender Shield for a couple years now and I just found out that they have the same setup. The backside of the cover may deflect RFID scanning, but apparently not EMF radiation. It’s the front flap/cover that protects. So we all need to be aware of this when we use whatever product we purchase.

Thanks for this article. I was searching for a better looking version of the Defender Shield and I am now seriously considering the SafeSleeve. At first I thought it was a negative that they only had the front shielding, but then I looked up my current product and found the same. It is what it is, I guess.

]]> By: Gemma S https://superfoodly.com/best-radiation-blocking-cell-phone-cases/#comment-38160 Mon, 06 Aug 2018 16:43:53 +0000 https://superfoodly.com/?p=5645#comment-38160 Like Kelvin, I had a negative experience with SafeSleeve.
I had purchased an RF meter to measure radiation emitted when the phone during a call without the case and then with the case.
THERE WAS NO DIFFERENCE.
The company’s customer service was defensive, alleging that my at-home test with an RF meter was not a true and reliable test and that only when conducted in a laboratory with a control would the test be considered valid.
Well, either the sleeve blocks 99.9% of all emissions or it doesn’t. The point is, anything less than what the company is advertising constitutes FRAUD. If they had said a 50% reduction would be seen, then the RF meter should have reflected that. Methinks that this company is duping a lot of customers. While the product ‘looks’ good, my experience was that it made NO difference at all. In fact, it was worse having this case and the notion of false security. I ended up getting horrific migraines right after I started using it. I was falsely confident that I was being protected. Perhaps part of the case blocked the signal which forced the phone to work that much harder, therefore nullifying any benefit. Please note, consumers. I would not recommend SafeSleeve based on my experience.
My concerns were brought up to the company’s customer service representatives. I was summarily dismissed.

]]> By: Anneka Evans https://superfoodly.com/best-radiation-blocking-cell-phone-cases/#comment-26960 Wed, 11 Apr 2018 05:59:39 +0000 https://superfoodly.com/?p=5645#comment-26960 Whereabout’s does the omitted radiation end up once it has been blocked by the sleeve?

]]>